The Dangerous Comfort of a Bobblehead Board
When a board makes it easy to say “yes,” they are lying to you about how bad they want to say “no.”
I used to work at an organization whose Board of Directors had a rubber stamp.
They voted yes on nearly everything leadership proposed. Often with smiles. Frequently, with glances at their watches.
I remember reviewing the annual budget one year. Aggressive? Yes. Enough to brace ourselves for The Inquisition upon presentation? Also yes.
We pored over every line item, developing defenses. We anticipated arguments over assumptions. We dreaded the debate over ROI. Worst-case scenarios. Anything.
Every readiness flew without so much as a meaningful question.
The leadership team left the room staring at each other in disbelief. There should have been celebrations. Instead, we questioned why we hadn’t asked for more.
If you’re reading this thinking, “Wow, your board was really lucky for you,” you are right. Except…not because of luck.
We were completely exposed.
Luck would’ve been if they cared enough to tear the thing apart. Healthy friction between a board and leadership is good. Healthy debate. Calling your assumptions. Rocking the boat once in a while.
When it’s easy to say yes they are lying to you about how bad they want to say no. Or maybe they are lying to themselves.
The False Confidence of the Bobblehead Board
Before I go further, let me say that yes, leaders contribute to this problem. Every time.
Failure to ask questions feels like confidence. Agreement feels like alignment. Easy approvals feel like momentum.
They do not.
Attendance Is Not Governance
If a board meets without engaging with you, they aren’t doing their job.
The quiet seduction of the rubber-stamp board is dangerous. For a CEO or Executive Director it can feel like freedom. You can execute on your vision without interference. Wins are celebrated. Losses are explained away. Meetings are quick. Renewals are easy.
Here’s the problem.
This type of board culture confuses trust and apathy.
Trust breeds sustained and thoughtful engagement. When a board votes on strategy without asking tough questions, they aren’t showing you support. They are refusing to do their job. They are shirking their responsibility to balance horsepower with brake fluid.
They are accruing governance debt. Like financial debt it builds up until someone has to pay the bill.
The Cultural Whiplash Nobody Plans For
Your board may actually be the least trained on what happens inside your organization.
When they say yes to everything, your staff eventually forgets they exist. Governance becomes theater. Something to endure once a quarter.
Not until it matters. Not until the board decides to do their job does the truth hit.
Staff reacts unpredictably. Especially if you have long tenured employees. I’ve walked hallways wondering how to explain the situation to my team.
“What do you mean the board said no?”
“Why do we have to run this past them now?”
Questions like these aren’t about being contrary. They believe oversight suddenly became bureaucracy for the sake of bureaucracy. Valid inquiries become personal attacks.
We never trained our staff to be accountable to the board because they never challenged us. In our ignorance, we didn’t just teach the board to disengage. We taught our staff it was okay to operate without oversight.
From “They Approved?” To “YOU FAILED”
Let’s say revenue is down. Or a product launch failed. Or maybe there’s a crisis no one could have anticipated.
Now the rubber stamp becomes a blunt weapon swung at leadership.
“We didn’t approve this budget!”
“Where did this idea come from?”
Because the board didn’t invest in the hard conversations, they feel no partnership in the outcome. To the board leadership pushed a risky plan and lied about the odds.
Think about how crazy that sounds. Leadership shoulders 100% of the blame for decisions the board was too lazy to understand. Because boards hate confrontation leaders create a culture where they either get fired or fail. Pick one.
Friction is like a parachute. If you don’t pull it it is useless at impact.
Leaders Should Fear the Apathetic Board
Leaders should fear board meetings that are too comfortable. Some friction is healthy. Here’s why.
When a board questions your strategy (and still supports it) they do three things.
First, they help you stress test your plans. Oftentimes, that will expose weaknesses. But sometimes it doesn’t. When a plan comes back intac,t your board has given you something very valuable. Partnership.
Implicit in that vote of support is confidence in you and your team. You’ve shared the burden of risk. That is WHY we have boards.
“We are in this together” isn’t meaningful unless both parties care.
Boards exist to help leaders mitigate risk. If they do their job when the inevitable hard times come, you are truly in this together. Boards say, “We failed.” Not “You failed.”
The old Nonprofit governance rule of thumb has always been “Nose in. Fingers out.” Except your board shouldn’t just smell for smoke.
Boards who abdicate their responsibility keep their noses completely out of your organization. Prove me wrong. If your board is unusually quiet push back at them. Ask questions.
Where do they think your plan falls short? What assumptions about your plan make them nervous? What would success need to look like for them to defend this to the public?
Make them own that vote. Invite the friction.
Have you ever walked out of a meeting relieved that the Board didn’t ask any questions, only to regret it later? I’d love to hear your stories about “governance debt.”
P.S. — Did this analysis provide you with a breakthrough strategy?
If so, please consider making a one-time tip to support the deep research and analysis that goes into every Backstory & Strategy post.
Additionally, if you found this post helpful, please restack it and share it with your audience. This spreads the word and keeps me writing the types of content you enjoy.