The Ultimate Test of Organizational Humanity
Bereavement leave exposes whether companies see workers as people—or productivity units.
I was recently texting with a friend whose father had just died. I asked her how she was, of course, but also a more specific question: how was work treating her?
“Yes,” she replied. “Totally. I’m going to also take next week off.”
Then she added: “I’m only taking three days as bereavement.”
She had three bereavement days to which she was entitled. After that, she would use vacation time to cover the rest.
“Three days,” I thought. Three days to plan a funeral and a memorial. Three days to acknowledge and process the loss of a parent. Three days, and then back to project plans and meeting expectations.
Her employer was not being mean. They were following procedure. It’s just that sometimes, procedure leaves humanity off the agenda.
The Strange History of Bereavement Leave
Bereavement leave tells the story of how America came to think about work.
For most of American history, when families worked the land or operated a small business, time off for a crisis was not a formal proposition. It was a given.
Factory work and the rise of white-collar employment changed that. When work left the farm or family shop, the implicit flexibility that had defined work life vanished. Loss and mourning now had to be requested, scheduled, granted. Absence in times of need was no longer natural—it became an exception.
Unions recognized this shift. In the 1920s and 1930s, they began bargaining for bereavement leave. At first, it was unpaid and limited, usually covering only immediate family. But it established a principle: in a humane workplace, bereavement leave was a right.
After World War II, the market for workers heated up. Employers didn’t just compete on salary; they competed on benefits. To stand out, they had to acknowledge that workers were whole human beings who sometimes faced loss.
As HR professionalized, discretionary compassion became codified policy. Spontaneous mercy was converted into institutional procedure.
Today’s Policies
Two-thirds of U.S. employers offer some form of bereavement leave today. That sounds generous until you look closer.
Oregon and Illinois are the only states that require paid bereavement leave by law. The standard is still just three to five days for immediate family and a single day for extended relatives.
Globally, the U.S. looks like a miser. Japan offers 10 or more days in certain circumstances. New Zealand legislated bereavement leave to cover miscarriage and stillbirth. Some European countries offer several weeks. By comparison, the U.S. standard seems designed more to minimize absence than to support employees.
Remote work hasn’t shifted this as much as you might think. Telecommuting can help—handling arrangements from home may ease some burdens. But it can also create subtle pressure to be “online” sooner. In a Slack-obsessed world, it’s harder to be visibly absent.
Progressive Approaches
Standard policies treat grief as one-and-done: here are your three days, now back to work. But employees know grief doesn’t work that way.
Some organizations are catching up. They now cover chosen family, acknowledging that the death of a best friend can devastate more than the loss of a relative you rarely saw. Others extend compassion to pet loss, recognizing animals as family members. The most progressive companies account for complicated grief—trauma, suicide, or loss after long-term caregiving—where healing takes longer.
But here’s the catch: flexible policies are meaningless if employees don’t feel free to use them. If a manager signals, even subtly, that it’s time to be “full steam ahead”—camera on, emails answered, projects delivered—most employees won’t take more time than the baseline. Policy on the books matters less than policy in action.
The Emotional Bottom Line
How a company handles bereavement ripples across the organization. Employees notice whether support is genuine or if a colleague is nudged to “tough it out.” They notice if managers acknowledge their own losses or stay silent. They notice if leaders show vulnerability or retreat into formality.
These choices send signals. Compassion strengthens trust. Indifference erodes it.
Done well, bereavement support becomes a source of cultural strength. Done poorly, it undermines it.
Here’s the Bottom Line
Bereavement leave is not just another benefit. It is one of the ultimate tests of organizational humanity—a test given when employees are at their most vulnerable.
Policies tell one story. Humans tell another. The real challenge is to make sure those stories match.
Because employees remember how they were treated during their lowest moments. They remember when their employer chose compassion over efficiency. And those memories last a lot longer than three days.
👉 How has your workplace handled grief—yours or someone else’s? Did they show real compassion, or just follow the handbook? Share your experiences in the comments—I’d like to hear what true organizational humanity (or its absence) has looked like for you.
P.S. - If you found this post helpful, would you please consider restacking it and sharing it with your audience?
This spreads the word and keeps me writing the types of content that you have enjoyed.