Your Mission's Secret Weapon: The P&L
It’s time for nonprofits to stop fearing the Profit & Loss statement and start using it to drive data-driven decisions and supercharge their mission.
In commercial media, P&L thinking wasn’t a nice-to-have. It was an existential must-have. Editorial decisions were costed out and audience strategies were assigned revenue targets. Pivoting into product from editorial, I started thinking about everything through a P&L perspective. It just made it easier to keep track of where we were and where we were going.
Then I pivoted into the nonprofit space. I was floored by how P&Ls were treated like some sort of alien black magic that was sure to corrupt the mission if anyone looked at it too closely. When I tried to explain we should build our admin expenses into our next grant proposal, I was met with side-eye and shaking heads as if the very act of accounting for the full cost of running a program was somehow disingenuous. It wasn’t. It was just sound business acumen.
I’ve written before about the challenge of moving from a service delivery mindset into a product mindset. But if you’ve already got that product-thinking muscle activated, it’s time to start thinking about managing your organization’s money the same way, too.
Manage Your Mission Like a Portfolio
Building a P&L for each program forces you to understand its true economics. You’ll quickly see which programs are actually pushing you toward sustainability, and which are just gravy-making. This can be hugely valuable in organizations where certain areas of work get high engagement, but poor monetization, while other pieces quietly go about delivering a healthy return on investment.
Picture your public television station of choice. They might produce five different shows, but are they all created equal? One might have three sponsors, one might be entirely grant-funded, and one might be purely mission-aligned with no direct financial support. By building a P&L for each show, you can manage your portfolio of offerings more like an investment portfolio. You might treat high-growth, low-margin shows differently than your mature, fat-margin cash cows that are happy to fund innovation in other areas.
The moment you can see exactly where money is made and lost, decisions about resource allocation start to be made based on data, not politics. You can double down on what’s working, and either fix or sunset what isn’t.
Ownership Changes Everything
The moment people are held accountable for their program’s P&L, they become real business owners. Conversations move from “we need more features” to “this feature will drive X revenue with a Y cost to serve.” This is a very different conversation when your success is being measured by real business metrics.
I know what you’re thinking: “We don’t have product managers,” or “It’s different in nonprofit.” You may or may not have a P&L for each program, and you may or may not call them product managers, but I promise this applies to your org, too. This is less about job titles and more about a state of mind. When people are empowered to think about the business impact of their work, they start to act like owners.
Breaking Down Barriers to Thinking Like a Business
For many nonprofits, there’s a deep-seated belief that once you put a number on your impact, you cheapen the mission. That somehow “doing good” is a different and lesser kind of work that shouldn’t be measured the same way as “making money,” even though having a healthy budget is how you’re able to do more good.
Let’s be honest: for many nonprofit founders and leaders, they’ve come up through programs with roots in social work or advocacy, not financial ops. They’re experts in making the world better. They don’t know how to balance a P&L or run a finance team. Grant funding doesn’t help with this either. When all your grant reports ask you to report on specific outcomes of your program, as opposed to a full picture of the organization’s health, you train your team to chase compliance over efficiency.
Oh, and for many groups, unlike a simple for-profit, you’ve got layers of restricted grants and donations and earned revenue. Each money source has its own compliance rules that make the simple P&L analysis legitimately more complex.
How to Start
It doesn’t have to be all or nothing. You can start small.
Choose One Program. Pick a single, discrete service your organization offers.
Map the Money. List all of the funding you have tied directly to it, and all its direct costs like staffing and materials.
Include Overhead. Attribute a reasonable share of your administrative and operations costs to this program. This is the step a lot of nonprofits skip, but this is the truly important step.
See Where You Stand. Is this service running a surplus or a deficit? The exact number is less important than the ensuing strategic conversation.
Here’s the thing: nonprofit groups that embrace this way of thinking tend to be a hell of a lot more sustainable. And, in the end, sustainable nonprofits serve more people. Think of groups like Charity: Water or Teach for America that use the sophisticated tools of business to squeeze every last drop of efficiency from their operations, but never lose sight of their fierce mission focus.
That said, the cultural change is slow work. But it’s necessary work. The first step isn’t firing your CFO; it’s challenging the belief that financial discipline and social mission are opposing forces. They’re two sides of the same coin.
The real question is: which of your programs are you willing to put under the microscope?
P.S. - If you found this post helpful, would you please consider sharing it with your audience?
This spreads the word and keeps me writing the types of content that you have enjoyed.