
A Quick Disclaimer: Backstory & Strategy is a personal, independent publication. The views, analysis, and commentary expressed here are strictly my own and do not represent the official position, strategy, or endorsement of the American Press Institute, its leadership, or its board. This is my personal space for analyzing the media landscape, testing new frameworks, and thinking out loud.
I was in Arlington, VA, recently for one of my regular trips down to our offices, just walking down the street between meetings, when I saw a storefront that made me completely stop in my tracks.
It had these massive, crystal-clear glass windows. Ambient, warm lighting. Tight, minimalist architecture. Simple, elegant branding.
I stood there looking at it for a second, trying to figure out what it actually was. There were no goofy cartoon drawings of teeth. No garish fluorescent lights buzzing in a drop ceiling. No silly posters of smiling models promising a brighter future. It looked like a boutique hotel lobby, or maybe one of those absurdly expensive direct-to-consumer flagship stores where they sell $200 water bottles.
Then I saw the lettering near the door.
It was a dentist’s office.
I kind of stood on the sidewalk and laughed to myself, but the more I walked, the more I couldn’t get it out of my head. Because once you start noticing them, you realize these places are sprouting up everywhere. Strip malls, urban transit hubs, suburban town centers.
The Most Expensive Sentence in Leadership
If you've ever heard a news executive justify a quiet retreat by saying "we had no choice," you know how costly that phrase really is. In The Most Expensive Sentence in Leadership, I dive into why that sentence signals a breakdown in organizational habits and board governance—and why waiting until your back is against the wall is the most expensive mistake a leader can make.
When you peel back that beautiful front desk, you realize dentistry isn’t having some random, superficial design trend. They are wrestling with the exact same corporate and financial machinery that has battered local journalism for the last twenty years.
First, there’s the revenue squeeze. The basic stuff a dentist does—routine cleanings, basic X-rays, standard fillings—has been crushed by stagnant insurance reimbursement rates that haven’t kept pace with inflation. Insurance companies dictate what a cleaning is worth, and a solo practice can’t just magically raise its prices to match their actual costs.
Sound familiar? That’s our commodity reporting. The baseline local news that everyone needs, but that gets squeezed into oblivion by third-party ad networks and platform algorithms. If your entire operation relies on third parties setting your rates, you’re on a treadmill to nowhere.
So modern dental practices adapted by moving up the value chain. They started treating the routine cleaning as a relationship builder—a top of the funnel—and built high-margin, out-of-pocket services like clear aligners, teeth whitening, and cosmetic procedures on top of it.
Now, there’s a real operational catch here. A dentist has a captive patient sitting in the chair to upsell aligners to. A newsroom launching a premium business vertical doesn’t. You can’t just slap a $50-a-month paywall on a niche newsletter and expect your general audience to convert. You still have to solve distribution from scratch by identifying the specific, high-intent readers who actually need that utility, and then building a targeted funnel just for them.
They also realized that going to the dentist carries massive historical dread. Nobody wants to get their teeth drilled. So they retailized trust. They redesigned every single point of friction—online booking, simple text messages, transparent pricing, environments that don’t smell like antiseptic—to make you actually feel comfortable walking through the door.
Compare that to what we do to our readers. We ask them to trust our journalism, but when they click on our websites, we hit them with flashing layout shifts, three different pop-ups, clunky paywalls, and pages that take ten seconds to load on a mobile phone. We make the experience of consuming local news feel like sitting in a sterile medical waiting room built in 1995, and then we wonder why people wander off to cleaner alternatives.
But there is a much darker side to this rollout—and this is where the media parallel gets uncomfortably real.
Behind that sleek storefront in Arlington isn’t just a clever local doctor. It’s almost certainly a Dental Service Organization, or DSO. DSOs are private-equity-backed corporate umbrellas that buy up independent local practices, strip out the business friction, and centralize HR, payroll, procurement, and billing.
Journalism Has the Receipts. It Won’t Use Them.
Arts organizations figured out decades ago that donors respond to numbers, not nobility — attendance counts, tourism dollars, economic multipliers. Journalism still leads with "democracy dies in darkness" and wonders why the check doesn't come. This piece argues newsrooms already have the receipts to make the economic case for their work — they just won't use them.
If that sounds suspiciously like what private equity and hedge funds have done to local newspapers over the last fifteen years, that’s because it’s the exact same playbook. Private equity firms realized that healthcare, like local media, had a massive, fragmented ecosystem of independent practitioners drowning in administrative overhead.
And just like in media, when private equity takes over dentistry, the dark side hits fast. Private-equity-owned practices have repeatedly faced Department of Justice enforcement actions for setting aggressive corporate revenue quotas, pushing unnecessary procedures on patients, and prioritizing investor yields over care. It’s the dental equivalent of Alden Global Capital stripping a newsroom down to ghost offices just to bleed out a 20% margin.
Which brings us to the real fork in the road for local news.
Dentistry proved that the “platform layer”—centralizing the boring, heavy backend so practitioners can focus on the craft—is the only way to survive modern economic squeezes. But because they let private equity build that platform layer for them, the craft itself is now at risk of being financialized to death.
We in local journalism are standing in the exact same spot.
Right now, we treat news collaborations like friendly literary clubs. We share Google Docs. We co-publish investigations. We host joint events. But behind the scenes? Every single newsroom is still running its own separate payroll, maintaining its own custom, quirky tech stack, and drowning in the exact same administrative headaches over and over again. Sharing a story doesn’t lower your operational expenses.
When it comes to sharing actual backend services, we hit a wall. We get terrified of losing our editorial independence, or we fall in love with the weird custom tech we spent thousands of dollars building, or we get stuck in polite consensus because nobody has the authority to make a hard business call for the group.
If we don’t build a shared, mission-aligned platform layer ourselves, someone else will—or independent newsrooms will simply collapse under the weight of their own overhead.
We don’t need another grant program that asks reporters to become corporate ops experts. And we certainly don’t need hedge funds coming in to “optimize” our backends into oblivion.
What we desperately need is a neutral, independent coordination layer—a dedicated Field Coordination Organization (FCO). A shared backend that handles the heavy, invisible plumbing of tech, procurement, HR, and product design, so that small, high-utility newsrooms can just focus on reporting on their communities.
Philanthropy and funding coalitions like Press Forward can give us capital, but funders aren’t software engineers or operations directors. They can’t build the plumbing for us.
We have to build the shared infrastructure ourselves. Because if we don’t own the platform layer, someone like Alden Global Capital will eventually own it for us.
Over to You
Have you seen this DSO expansion happening in your own neighborhood? More importantly, how is your newsroom handling the balance between editorial independence and backend operational overhead? Are you seeing appetite for shared infrastructure in your region, or are autonomy fears still holding folks back?
Drop a comment below or hit reply—I’d love to hear your perspective.
Evaluating Your Newsroom’s Health?
If you are working through your own product design, user friction, or revenue mix, check out our NewsGrade framework to audit your publication’s operational readiness and audience trust metrics.




Boom! Nailed it. We live in a software era, and software is all about scale.
As somebody with nearly 30 years of software experience, the biggest challenge news organizations face is that they’re designed to be local, so they cannot afford, nor do they have mentality to think beyond their local community, so as a result can’t/will not design their organizations and systems to scale nationally much less globally, and as a result, become victims of those who design and operate at scale.
That’s why I’m building Fido, to deliver national/global scale but with a local focus, and in a way that can be leveraged by local publishers.
It’s the platform, stupid! And until we understand and build it, we will always be held hostage to those who do.